OK. “So You Have An Invention – So What?”
So – – what – in the event that you don’t have a development – however might truly want to? In
different words – how does the innovative interaction function?
First – we should take a gander at the meaning of the word design:
Imagine = make or plan (something that has not existed previously); be the
originator of : as in – he imagined a better type of the steam motor; or,
currently, she concocted another type of CPU.
INSIDE PROCESS – OUTSIDE BOXES – WOO
Creation implies utilizing your inside inventor ideas cerebrum cycles and afterward thinking outside the
box – making a better approach for thinking, or handling, or making a new thing –
which a great deal of times makes another cycle in the public aggregate brain of – “why
didn’t I consider that?” The creator thinks about “that,” “this,” “them,”
“those,” “how, what, when, where and why,” and for the most part, another way from
every other person.
Presently, the creative interaction can get sort of creepy as well. It resembles this multitude of thoughts are
simply drifting out there in the ethers and one psyche (now and again at least two)
only sort of globs onto the thought like a dreamcatcher and creates it.
The explanation I say that is through the experience of at least a couple of times having an
innovator come to me with a thought that sounds genuinely unique – just to do a patent
search and observe that a similar thought was “pulled out of the ethers” simultaneously
by another person – even from some place across the world. I’m speaking condescendingly to the
same date and time in certain occasions. It turns out to be genuinely bizarre …. however, that is part
of the interaction.
I’m persuaded that there are mind waves – quantum quarks – equal universes –
whatever – that people pull from to make. For what other reason would test takers all through
a state, while composing an exposition test, concoct similar expressions – a great deal of
times, in exactly the same words. The specific test I allude to is kept in complete mystery –
equivalent to the Bush organization – so there can’t swindle. (?) I need to accept
it is a shared perspective shaped in test-taking that flies through the ethers
furthermore, is gotten through pressure prompted recieving wires.
Back to the interaction. In a basic manner it is simply taking an issue and afterward settling
it in another manner. A decent part of licenses and innovations are the consequence of one
individual having an awkward encounter, pondering internally “there should be
another way” – and afterward tracking down it.
An innovator questions – everything …
Should this be possible in another manner? …
Is that the most ideal way? …
Is there a superior way? …
SO … if you have any desire to imagine something – check out your own universe. Find
something that you might want to see refined. Pay attention to others and
their necessities. Keep records. Check out at processes in your home life and work life that raise
issues. Record them on paper.
At the point when you have a couple of issues down on paper – consider. Think.
Moving to the dreamlike once more – when I for one have an issue to tackle – I just
sit and consider it. Similarly as recorded as a hard copy – sit and gaze at a clear piece of paper, or
an unfilled word processor screen – it’s a similar perspective. Recorded as a hard copy, I gaze
at the clear piece of paper and nothing occurs. No words show up – no contemplations.
Then – I tell my sub-cognizant to tackle the issue, set a cutoff time, and move away
from it for some time.
Your sub-cognizant will keep on taking care of on the issue and in the event that there is an answer –
you have an incredible shot at tracking down it. I do that a ton. I think … I’m clear … I say to
myself “make it happen” and go for a stroll. Here and there I can’t get back quickly enough to
catch every one of the thoughts that stream forward.
TEST – TEST – TEST
Testing your thought is another step. The thought might be great – however should be worked
out and worked over. The innovator is endlessly hopeful. Disappointment isn’t a word.
Summarizing Thomas Edison when he worked – – and worked – – and dealt with the
light – – I didn’t fall flat, I just found 9,999 different ways a light doesn’t work.
Presently, a few innovators imagine to create. I have had individuals who go
for and get a patent and are pleased as punch to have the patent papers outlined and
held tight their wall. Others would rather not share their “child” with the world and put
up a wide range of walls to stop the improvement of the thought.
What I am talking about here is be pragmatic. If you have any desire to concoct – develop things that are
required and can sell. Far superior if “your child” is needed as well on a case by case basis. Furthermore,
one more thought is the capacity to deliver your innovation at a sensible cost.
An illustration of this is the page on my site that discussions about the SkyCar. It is an extraordinary
thought – genuinely creative – required in a great deal of ways – and needed by quite a few people. Yet, the
unique expense of one unit will be $3.5 million. Mr. Moller has been dealing with this
idea “vehicle” for more than twenty years. It began more like a flying saucer – presently it
is more a flying Ferrari.
It is sad – however on the off chance that his thought was a new can opener – it might have “gotten off the
ground” significantly earlier in light of reduced improvement costs.
Wanting to think NOT TO BE SUED BY NIKE – JUST DO IT
The main thing to worry about to concoct – is to simply
begin. Utilize a portion of the thoughts I have spread over here and get your juices streaming. Get
the noggin ruminating. Track down an opening and fill it.
The more you practice your contemplating inclination – the simpler it becomes. Who
knows – you could be the person who concocts another central processor – a vehicle that
runs on grass – or another mouse trap. Paradise realizes many have attempted that one –